The “FOKOF” debacle!

I feel that seeing as though this debacle has reached a high on the list of hot topics, i should shed my opinion on the matter.

I have been reading a whole lot about the Fokofpolisiekar arguments. I have heard Pro-fokof arguments as well as Anti-fokof arguments. I am not for either. I couldn't give a shit what fokof do, i really could not give a rats tiny arsehole. I, however, do understand and respect both sides of the argument. I understand and respect the Pro-side, which as Uno mildly put it, they are a product of "suburban life" by which he means the northern suburbs of Cape Town. Which as we all know, house the majority of the white Afrikaners within in the city limits. There are many strange and wonderful people out there, and I think that Uno's generalisation is a bit off key, I fully understand his intent, however it could be perceived in the wrong way. Not everyone that comes out of the suburbs are predisposed to be angry and unhappy, especially angry and unhappy towards their parents. Not every suburban parent is conservative and have ridiculous moral values. It probably is correct that the former is exactly what fokof are, which is why i don't actually like them, I don't relate to them, I don't understand the hate and stupidity, yes stupidity, then again, i am not mad about rock music per-se. I also believe that the followers are not all poenks and pussy's, but some of them hunt for an image. Fokof are cool, I don't think they are, but they make money and people buy their music, so they must be doing something right. I also understand and respect the Anti-side, because one has to be objective about societal acts. And in my opinion, being blasphemous out in the open would prove to be extremely offensive for the religious crowd. Now, I don't agree, nor do i disagree with the boycotts and protests and just plain hostile take on the whole situation. If the darned dude wants to rant and rave against God, he should actually keep it to himself, because a whole lot of the people that pay for the food on his plate on a daily basis, are religious. We know that there are a good couple of religious people that listen to afrikaans rock. It is however, their very own choice to do as they please. If they feel they need to be blasphemous to broadcast their message, then they are indeed stupid as per my current opinion.
When starting a band, you have two things in mind. One, a love and passion for music. Two, money. Now there are two takes on the latter. I have no idea what their sales figures are, but i can only imagine that the blasphemy of one band member could cripple the band. Many of the followers are not going to be interested in purchasing their music if they persist to be blasphemous, they could also gain other followers that think it's cool to be blasphemous. Now, I am not 100% clear on this topic so I am going to leave it at that. I do think that if they had just not been blasphemous, they would have saved themselves a whole lot of discomfort. Don't you think that the other band members should try and keep one rogue member in order??? Which is why i think the whole band are a couple of sods. I say this with great relief and i know that none of them are going to try and lash out at me if they read this article. They clearly do believe in freedom of speech, which I am a firm believer in. So here's to that!!! FUCK YOU FOKOFPOLISIEKAR, EK DINK JULLE IS KAK!!
Now i have broken a rule to what i believe to be freedom of speech. I believe that your freedom of speech is only yours if it does not infringe on the rights of other people. Which in fact, is what our law system is based on, the roman law side of it anyway. You have your rights, up until they infringe on those of others, in which case, they are not your rights.